How Leadership Styles Impact IS Implementation Success - The Thesis

Header Ads

How Leadership Styles Impact IS Implementation Success


A person with an open palm upon which a laptop and tablet has been placed. .

Disclaimer: This article is a thesis review.

Researcher: J. B.

Abstract
Public Sector Organizations (PSOs) are huge and complex. In an era where civilization is increasingly becoming digital and where information has now become a critical resource, factor of production and commodity, change is the only constant thing.  Available data suggests that productivity and ultimately, the quality of service delivery to citizens by PSOs can be enhanced by the successful implementation of Information Systems (IS). However, successful implementation of IS in the public sector, and for that matter the Ghanaian public sector,  has been found to be greatly impacted upon by the project leaders’ leadership styles. The study therefore sought to investigate the impact of leadership styles on IS implementation success in the Ghanaian public sector. The study was essentially quantitative in nature and employed the empirical research design. Primary data was collected by questionnaire administration and was analysed using statistical software packages.  The most dominant leadership style within the PSO was found to be the transformational leadership style (Mean Likert score = 3.74) because it registered the highest Likert mean score, with transactional leadership style being the least dominant (Mean Likert score = 3.14), suggesting that the former seem to be the most preferred leadership style in PSOs. All the identified leadership styles positively but insignificantly correlated with IS projects implementation success in the public sector of Ghana, implying that leadership styles in general are strongly associated with IS implementation success.

Ad: We offer a range of writing and research services. Find out more!

Transformational leadership style is the leadership style that may probably guarantee greater success overall in IS project implementation in PSOs; because, it significantly accounted for the variance in three out of the four IS project implementation success measures utilized for the study. When handling IS projects within PSOs, it is advisable to first determine the most important success measure critical to the organization and or project before initiation. This is because this knowledge will inform the choice of leadership style that will be used to tackle the IS projects. Why? Because findings from the study indicate that the choice of different leadership styles may have varying influence on the different attributes of IS implementation success, be it completion of project within scheduled time, prevention of cost overruns, and or meeting required specifications or standards of quality.

Introduction
The Public Sector (PS) is a huge and complex organization, whose operations and strategic aspiration can be enhanced by the successful implementation of Information Systems (IS) to support improvements in productivity and ultimately, the quality of services to citizens (Gichoya, 2005).
The current global landscape is very much different from that of past years. In fact, we are in an era where civilization is increasingly becoming digital (Heeks, 2008) and where information has now become a critical resource, factor of production and commodity (Beaumaster, 1999).

Leadership styles are critical to the successful delivery of information systems products and services (Thite, 2000). These have been identified as a major contributory factor in the delivery of information systems (IS) projects and organizational effectiveness in the public sector (Thite, 2000).

Objectives
The main aim of this study is to assess the impact of leadership styles on information systems projects implementation success in the public sector.

Key Findings
The identified leadership styles prevailing in the randomly selected public sector organizations (PSOs) were Transformational, Technical and Transactional leadership styles. The dominant leadership style within Ghanaian PSOs in the context of IS implementation was found to be Transformational leadership style.

All the identified leadership styles positively correlated with IS projects implementation success in the public sector of Ghana. Transformational, technical and transactional leadership styles recorded Pearson correlation coefficients, r values, of 0.90, 0.81 and 0.73 respectively. None of these r values was found to be statistically significant. However, the relationship between Transformational leadership style and the success measures: project completion within scheduled time, required specifications or quality standards met was observed to be statistically significant.

There is a significant association between the project leader’s transformational leadership style and the leadership outcome factor, effectiveness, as well as technical leadership style and satisfaction. Technical and Transformational leadership styles had the most considerable impact on leadership outcome factors in general.

Transformational leadership style was found to have significant impact on project being completed within scheduled time, meeting of required specifications or quality standards, and the extent of project successfulness, but not on cost.

The cost-related success measure, no cost overruns, was however significantly impacted upon by both transactional and technical leadership styles, with technical leadership style having the greater effect. Hence, transformational leadership style is most likely to have the greatest effect on project success; however in combination with technical leadership style project success will further be enhanced due to impact of technical leadership style on the cost-related success measure.

Recommendations
When handling IS projects within PSOs, it is advisable to first determine the most important success measure critical to the organization and or project before initiation. This is because this knowledge will inform the choice of leadership style that will be used to tackle the IS projects. Why? Because findings from the study indicate that the choice of different leadership styles may have varying influence on the different attributes of IS implementation success, be it completion of project within scheduled time, prevention of cost overruns, and or meeting required specifications or standards of quality.

Technical leadership style should be adopted when subordinates are dissatisfied. Subordinates should be given more autonomy/independence. The leader should take the necessary steps to prevent organizational bureaucracy from interfering with the work of subordinates.

It is also advised that transformational and technical leadership styles be utilized in combination because they significantly enhance leadership outcome factors. Under these two leadership styles, there is the giving of extra effort, enhancement of leadership effectiveness and satisfaction on the part of subordinates.
You Might Also Like

Some References
Agarwal, B. (1998). Delivering breakthrough systems. Enterprise Management Institute, Summit Online, Succeeding at Implementation, http://www.summitonline.com/succeed/papers/tanning1.html

Al-Dmour. H. and Awamleh. R. (2002). Effects of transactional and transformational styles of sales managers on Job-satisfaction and self-perceived performance of sales people: A Study of Jordanian manufacturing Public Shareholding Companies. Diraszgt: Administrative Sciences, 29(1): 247-261


Altameem, T., Zairi, M. and Alshawi, S. (2006). Critical success factors of E-government: A proposed model for E-government implementation. Proceeding of Innovations in Information Technology, Dubai, pp. 1-5.

Beaumaster, S. (1999). Information Technology Implementation Issues : An Analysis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. IEEE Computer Society, 41(6), pp.26–31.

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.