Determinants of Interest Rates Spreads in Ghana
Introduction
After Ghana's
independence – up until the early part of the 1980s – interest rates and prices
of a number of commodities were largely independent of market forces (Mensah
and Abor, 2012). This was because of government interference in the banking
sector; to the extent that, government dictated how much interest rates banks
should charge for their loan offerings, thus indirectly eliminating competition
and dictating the degree to which banks can become efficient, effective and or
even profitable.
Furthermore,
government heavily borrowed from the banks. Making matters worse, most of these
funds were usually directed towards projects that were deemed more politically
expedient than really profitable (Mensah and Abor, 2012). Consequently, the
banks became riddled with a lot of bad debts since government couldn’t pay back
its loans. This situation adversely affected the Ghanaian economy, with the
financial sector being possibly the worse off.
It was therefore no
surprise to observe the Ghanaian financial system lacking ability to provide
financial services at low cost (Owusu-antwi, 2009), thus triggering the need for reforms in the financial
sector during the 1980s and early 1990s.This eventually led to the initiation of two economic
programmes by the World Bank in conjunction with the government of Ghana in the
country - (1) Economic Recovery Programme (ERP); and the (2) Structural
Adjustment Programme (SAP). Under the Economic Recovery Programme (ERP) and the
Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), controls on interest rates were lifted
whilst all forms of directed credit was done away with. In a nut shell, governmental
control of interest rates may have been one of the major factors if not the major factor of the economic woes of
the 1980s.
In Need of Writing Services? Contact us for quality work!
In Need of Writing Services? Contact us for quality work!
In 1987, interest
rates became liberalized, thus it was allowed to partially float (Alexander et
al., 1995). This was made possible by the abolition of maximum lending rates
and minimum deposit rates. Three years later, controls on bank charges and fees
were also removed setting the stage for stiff competition within the banking
sector. The banking sector was given a further lift when the main instrument of
monetary control during ERP which was bank specific credit ceilings was
abolished in 1992 and swapped for another (Alexander
et al., 1995; Owusu-antwi, 2009). The substitute instrument for money
control was indirect and market based and it entailed the weekly auctioning of
both 91-Day and 182-Day Treasury Bills and other government and BOG securities,
backed up with statutory cash reserve and liquid asset requirements (Alexander
et al., 1995). As a result of these series of measures, banks were no longer
subject to constraints on how deposits and loans are priced and into which
particular sectors of the economy loans are directed. It was not until 2003
that the banking system became fully deregulated with the introduction of
the universal banking regime.
In Ghana, as in most countries, regulation rather than competition has defined the structure and range of financial products and services a bank can offer, the types of assets and liabilities it can hold and issue as different
kinds of banking institutions licensed to serve a diverse clientele base (Bawumia, Belnye,
& Ofori, 2005). There are currently thin lines of difference
among them as the products and services rendered by the different bank types
have converged over time and emerging non-bank financial institutions now
compete with the banks in terms of the provision of similar kind of financial
instruments and services. Bank deposits, for example, compete now with other
liabilities of financial intermediaries, such as mutual funds. This phenomenon
seems to justify the commencement of universal banking in Ghana, whereby banks
originally licensed as merchant or development banks can now be issued
universal banking licenses with higher paid-up capital. This move was to
eliminate the economic costs of maintaining regulatory barriers, which had
risen although the barriers had become less effective. The universal banking
concept is not only aimed at eliminating the differences due to similarity in
bank products/services rendered but also restrictions on branch network of
different bank types, as banks become “universal”.
The Ghanaian
banking industry is steadily nearing its “carrying capacity.” At present, there
are 27 universal banks, 137 rural and community banks, and 58 non-banking
financial institutions including finance houses, savings and loans, leasing and
mortgage firms in the banking market (PriceWaterCooper, 2014), all jostling for
the same customers.
The success or otherwise of any financial system hinges so much on the amount of interest rate banks charge their
customers.Interest rate determines the overall financial health
of a country, and tends to affect inflation, exchange rate and depreciation. No
economy has a single
interest rate. In Ghana, for example, the commonly reported interest rates are
Bank of Ghana (BoG)' s Policy rate, the Treasury Bill rates, the rates on Bank
of Ghana bills, the inter-bank rate, and lending and deposit rates by banks.
These rates tend to fluctuate in a similar fashion (Mensah
& Abor, 2012).
Banks
are major players in the growth and development of any country’s economy. For
instance, the financial sector’s contribution to GDP grew from 4.5 % in 2002 to
6.3 % in 2007 (Owusu-antwi, 2009). One of the ways they influence the economy is through
financial intermediation; they channel funds from surplus to deficit
actors (Njuguna et al.,
2000). Financial intermediation is not without its risks as funds loaned out to
business people and organizations may eventually become bad debts making the
bank incur a loss as a result; hence, the need for interest rate spread – a
vital component of lending rates. The interest rate spread is essentially a
bank’s reward/profit for bearing the risk associated with given out depositors’
funds to a loan applicant for investment into his/her business for a certain
period of time. It must be noted that the borrower does not only pay for the
interest rate spread but also for the deposit rate, together termed lending rate.
In
simple terms, lending rates are
basically a function of both deposit rates and interest rate spread. The
deposit rate is the interest rate paid on savings of depositors, whereas the
interest rate spread is the difference between the lending rate and the deposit
rate. The more effective and efficient a bank is, the narrower the spread
between lending and deposit rates. Unfortunately in Ghana, high net interest
rate spreads is becoming the order of the day in the banking sector, as Ghana
has been noted overtime as one of the countries with persistently highest
interest rate spreads globally (Aboagye et. al, 2008; Bawumia et
al, 2005; Buchs and Mathisen, 2005; Gockel and Mensah, 2006;Owusu-antwi, 2009; Kwashie & Kyereboah-coleman,
2013), suggesting the
possibility of high cost inefficiencies in the financial sector. This thus beg the question of what exactly are the factors
determining interest rate spreads in the country, considering the fact that the
Ghanaian banking industry has been deregulated.
These implications of
banking sector inefficiency have triggered several debates in developing
countries about the determinants of banking sector interest rate spreads.
Studies have shown that there is a general view amongst some stakeholders that
high interest rate spreads are caused by the internal characteristics of the
banks themselves, such as their tendency to maximize profits, while many others
argue that the spreads are imposed by the macroeconomic, regulatory and
institutional environment in which banks operate. These debates can only be
resolved through an objective and quantitative analysis of the determinants of
the banking sector interest rate spreads in Ghana.
Available
data from literature on determinants of interest rate spreads can therefore be
grouped into three categories: bank-specific, bank-industry or market structure
and macroeconomic factors (Ngugi, 2001; Chirwa and Mlachila, 2002). Both
bank-specific and bank-industry factors constitute microeconomic variables.
Bank-Specific Determinants of Interest Rate spreads
Firstly,
bank-specific determinants of interest rate spreads are those factors intrinsic
to banks and these may range from non-performing loans (NPLs), excess
liquidity, overhead costs, market share to ownership of banks, credit risk,
liquidity risk, returns on assets, noninterest income, operating cost,
management quality (Rusuhuzwa, Karangwa, &
Nyalihama, 2016;
Asmare, 2014). Findings from a study carried out to assess the impact of
bank ownership type on interest rate spreads of banks in developing countries
revealed that foreign owned banks tended to have larger interest rate spreads
when compared to locally owned banks (Demirgüc-Kuntand & Huizinga, 1998),
an indication that ownership type plays a role in determining interest rate
spreads. Elsewhere, foreign ownership was found to be insignificant in
determining interest rate spreads in fourteen South American countries (Gelos,
2006). In Belize, market share and NPLs have been implicated as core
determinants of interest rate spreads (Perez, 2011). Furthermore, excess liquidity has been found
to be responsible for increasing interest rate spread in Belize (Perez, 2011).
The
foregoing data clearly suggest that determinants of interest rate spreads may
vary from country to country and even from region to region (Gelos, 2006); thus
buttressing the need to pin-point the exact determinants of interest rate
spreads in a country like Ghana. Research has also
shown that high interest rate spreads in the Kenyan financial sectors is due in
part to the market shares of the different banks. Operating expenses and credit
risk have been linked to widening interest rate spreads in Kenya (Rebei, 2014).
Industry-Specific Determinants of Interest Rate Spreads
Secondly, industry-specific factors affecting interest rates
spreads include competition, bank concentration and reserve requirement (Asmare, 2014).
Herfindahl–Hirschman index (HHI) is used as proxy for industry concentration.
The higher the HHI, the greater the level of market power in the hands of a few
banks. With such market power in the hands of a few banks, there is the
probability of these players colluding to 'fix' interest rates spreads, thereby
leading to lowered competition in the banking sector (Afzal, 2011; Ahokpossi, 2013).
Macroeconomic Determinants of Interest Rate Spreads
Macroeconomic factors
play a pivotal role in determining the interest rates spreads amongst the
commercial banks. Inflation and GDP
growth rate are some macroeconomic factors that affect the setting of interest
rates by banks (Mbao, Kapembwa, Mooka, Rasmussen,
& Sichalwe, 2014).
Inflation as a macroeconomic factor is crucial in interest rates spreads
determination. Banks are usually very responsive in incorporating changes in
inflation to their lending rates as opposed to deposit rates (Mensah
& Abor, 2012). In Ghana, it's been observed that
positive linkages exist between inflation rates and net interest margins, an
indication that improvements in the macroeconomic environment with regards to
lower inflation rates is an important prerequisite of lower net interest
margins (Aboagye et al., 2005; Bawumia et al., 2005).
Furthermore, a number of studies have been conducted showing
that inflation is a key determinant of interest rates spreads (Chirwa and
Mlachila, 2004; Beck and Hesse, 2009). A study by Beck and Hesse (2009)
reported the incidence of higher interest rates spreads in Ugandan banks in
response to inflation rates rise. This is confirmed by the work of Chirwa and
Mlachila (2004) in Malawian banks.
Interest Rate Spreads in Ghana
Bawumia, Belnye, & Ofori
(2005)
concede that market concentration in Ghana is a major problem and greatly
hinders efficiency in the financial sector. They also observed that high market
concentration dampens competition. Attempting to unearth the determinants of
interest rate spreads in the country; they found that market share appeared to
be probably the most important variable in accounting for the variability in
interest rate spreads in Ghana. This perhaps is why there is minimal or
non-existent price competition in the banking space. High operating costs,
non-performing loans and the existence of liquidity reserves were also observed
to be significant in explaining wide interest rate spreads. It must be noted
however, that the effect of non-performing loans and the liquidity reserve was
found to be not as significant as operating costs and market share.
Elsewhere, Mensah &
Abor (2012) reported that asset size, degree of concentration in the banking
industry, level of capital held by banks, reserve requirement and the level of
inflation were key to determining interest rate spreads in Ghana.
Problem Statement
Despite
general consensus amongst economists that when a country liberalizes its
financial system, economic growth and development can be assured and that there
will be an upsurge of loanable funds into banks by virtue of real interest rate
(Bawumia et al., 2005). However, after many years down the line in
post-liberalization Ghana, interest rate spreads continue to spin out of
control, making cost of access to finance either too expensive or burdensome
for businesses. So what went wrong? Ghana has over the years been identified as
one of the countries with the highest interest rate spreads in the world
(Aboagye et. al, 2008; Bawumia et al, 2005; Buchs and Mathisen, 2005; Gockel
and Mensah, 2006).
Despite
the macroeconomic stability chalked by Ghana in recent times, public opinion
hold that there is stunted growth in the private sector because businesses are
‘bleeding’ under the weight of excessive lending rates. It is important
therefore to investigate the factors accounting for this rather unpleasant
situation. Indeed, if Ghana is to attain a stable and efficient banking system,
an investigation into the study of the determinants of interest rate spreads
cannot be overlooked.
When the spread between lending
and deposit interest rates is too large, it is generally regarded as a
considerable impediment to the expansion and development of financial
intermediation, as it discourages potential savers by virtue of low returns on
deposits (Ndung'u and Ngugi, 2000) and limits financing for potential
borrowers, thus reducing feasible investment opportunities and therefore the
growth potential of the economy (Valverde et al, 2004). It is therefore
imperative that studies be conducted to ascertain the factors accounting for
the high interest rate spreads in the Ghanaian banking sector.
Objectives
The main objective of this study was to
investigate the determinants of interest rate spreads within the banking sector
of Ghana.
Key Findings
Bank
lending rates in Ghana rose especially after 2009, despite the deregulation
exercise. A lending rate low of 21.24 % was
registered in 2008, with respect to the period 2006-2008. However, this rate
was short-lived as it began to rise again.
Drawing upon the standardized beta coefficients though
insignificant (p> 0.05), the
following model can be put forward: IRS
= 0.1Markt_Share + 0.326NPL – 0.061Comptn. From the equation, it can be deduced
that as market share increases by a factor of 1, IRS will go up by a factor of
0.1; whereas in the case of non-performing loans, NPL, an increase in 1 point
will trigger an increment of 0.326 points in the IRS. However, with regards to
competition, when there is an increment of 1 point, IRS responds by a decline
of -0.061.
The coefficient of
determination, R-square was found to be a whopping 97.6 %, implying that the
variables under consideration vis-à-vis monetary policy rate, exchange rate,
inflation rate and GDP accounted for a massive 97.6 % of the variation in the
interest rate spread and it was significant (F change > sigf. F change).
This implied that post-deregulation period, the most important determinant of
interest rate determination may likely be factors outside the control of the
banks i.e. macroeconomic factors. This presents a rather unpleasant situation
for the banks, because it makes planning difficult.
Key Terms
Determinants of interest rates
5 key determinants interest rates
major determinants of interest rates
what are the determinants of interest rates
determinants of interest rate
bank with the highest interest rate in ghana
determinants of interest rates in an economy
bank loan interest rates in ghana
interest rate in ghana
determinant of interest rate
determinants of interest rates in finance
what are the determinants of interest rate
interest rate determinants
lending rate in Ghana
Researcher: C.A.M.
This post was a thesis review.
References
Aboagye, A. Q. Q., Akoena, S. K.,
Antwi-Asare, T. O. and Gockel, F. A. (2008). Explaining Interest Rate Spreads
in Ghana. African Development Review,
20(3), 378 – 399.
Afzal A. (2011). Interest rate spreads,
loan diversification and market discipline in Pakistan's commercial banking
sector‘, PhD thesis, University of Pakistan.
Ahokpossi, C. (2013). Determinants of
Bank Interest Margins in Sub-Saharan Africa, IMF Working Paper
WP/13/34.Washington D.C. International Monetary Fund Alexander, W., Thomas, E.,
Baling, J. T., and Epoch, C. (1995). The adoption of indirect instruments on
monetary policy. Occasional Paper 26. International Monetary Fund, Washington,
DC.
Asmare, A. (2014). Determinants
of Banks Interest rate spread: An Empirical Evidence from Ethiopian Commercial
Banks. Addis Ababa University.
Bawumia, M., Belnye, F.,
& Ofori, M. E. (2005). The Determination of Bank Interest Spreads in
Ghana: An Empirical Analysis of Panel Data (No. WP/BOG-2005/09). Accra,
Ghana.
Beck, T. and Hesse, H. (2009), Why are
Interest Spreads so High in Uganda? Journal
of Development Economics, 88, 192 – 204.
Buchs, T., and Mathisen, J. (2005),
Competition and Efficiency in Banking: Behavioral Evidence from Ghana, IMF
Working Paper WP/05/17.
Chirwa, E.W. and Mlachila, M. (2004).
Financial Reforms and Interest Rate Spreads in the Commercial Banking System in
Malawi. IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 51, No. 1, 96–122.
Demirguc-Kunt A. and Huizinga, H.
(1998). Determinants of commercial bank interest margins and profitability:
some international evidence. Available at www.elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-
9450-1900.
Gelos, G. R. (2006). Banking Spreads in
Latin America. IMF working paper, WP/06/44. (Washington: International Monetary
Fund).
Gockel, A. F. and Mensah, S. (2006).
Commercial Bank Interest Rate Spread in Ghana: Determinants and Policy
Implications, TIPCEE Working Paper, Accra.
Kwashie, D., &
Kyereboah-coleman, A. (2013). Macroeconomic and Industry Determinants of
Interest Rate Spread-Empirical Evidence. Developing Country Studies, 3(12),
90–100.
Mbao, F. Z., Kapembwa, C.,
Mooka, O., Rasmussen, T., & Sichalwe, J. (2014). Determinants of Bank Lending
Rates in Zambia: A Balance Sheet Approach.
Mensah, S., & Abor, J.
(2012). Agency Conflict and Bank Interest Spreads in Ghana. Accra.
Ngugi, R. W. (2001). An empirical
analysis of interest rate spread in Kenya. AERC Research Paper 106.
Ndung‘u, S. N. and Ngugi R. W. (2000).
Banking Sector Interest Rate Spread in Kenya. KIPPRA Discussion Paper No 5.
Owusu-antwi, G. (2009).
Impact Of Financial Reforms On The Banking System In Ghana. International
Business & Economics Research Journal, 8(3), 77–100.
PriceWaterCooper.
(2014). Ghana Banking Survey.
Rebei, N. (2014). Determinants of Interest Rate Spreads in Solomon
Islands (No. WP/14/105).
Rusuhuzwa, T. K., Karangwa,
M., & Nyalihama, C. (2016). Determinants of interest rate spread in Rwanda:
empirical evidence. Issues in Business Management and Economics, 4(3),
33–40.
Valverde, S. C., Del Paso, R.L. and
Fernandez, F.R. (2004) Banks, Financial Innovations and Regional Growth
No comments: