BECE 2015: Chief Examiner's Report for Religious and Moral Education - The Thesis

Header Ads

BECE 2015: Chief Examiner's Report for Religious and Moral Education



WAEC logo

GENERAL COMMENTS

1.                  STANDARD OF THE PAPER

The standard of the paper compared favourably with that of previous years. All the questions were chosen from a wide range of topics from the syllabus.

2.                  PERFORMANCE OF CANDIDATES

There was a general improvement in the performance of the candidates over that of last year in the areas of organization, adherence to the rubrics and legibility of handwriting. These improvements therefore translated into satisfactory performance

3.                SUMMARY OF CANDIDATES’ STRENGTHS

(1)               Majority of the candidates organized and presented their points satisfactorily.
(2)               Most candidates adhered to the rubrics of the paper and provided the required number of points for their responses.
(3)               Some candidates presented their answers in legible handwriting with clarity of expression.
(4)               Majority of the candidates exhibited adequate understanding of the question and provided good examples to support their answers.

4.                  SUMMARY OF CANDIDATES’ WEAKNESSES

(1)                 Some candidates tackled the questions without adequate understanding and therefore deviated.
(2)                 Some candidates wrote elaborate introductions, which were not required for the responses.
(3)                 Some candidates did not answer any questions at all.
(4)                 Most candidates had numerous grammatical errors and poor spellings in their answers.
(5)                 Few candidates had handwritings that were bad and difficult to read
(6)                 Candidates did not obey the rubrics of the paper. They answered more than the required number of questions for the paper.
(7)                 Some of the candidates did not indicate their index numbers on their answer booklets.

5.                  SUGGESTED REMEDIES

(1)               Teachers should advise candidates to read and understand questions before they tackle them.
(2)               Teachers must take candidates through question answering techniques to equip them and to adequately prevent them from presenting unnecessary materials.
(3)               Candidates must ensure they are properly prepared for the paper before presenting themselves for the examination.
(4)               Parents and teachers must encourage candidates to read a lot of books to enrich their grammar.
(5)               Teachers must take candidates with poor handwriting through some writing skills to ensure their handwritings are legible.
(6)               Teachers must stress the rubrics of the papers to candidates and advise them to read and understand every bit of information on the question paper before they provide their responses.
(7)               Invigilators and supervisors must ensure all candidates fill the front page of their answer booklets with their personal details before they start answering the questions.

DETAILED COMMENTS

Question 1
(a)                Write on how Joseph came to live in Egypt.
(b)               Mention four moral lessons learnt from the story.
This question was a popular one and was well attempted by a third of the candidates, except that a few deviated and wrote on the aftermath of Joseph’s arrival in Egypt. This phenomenon affected marks obtained by the candidates.
Candidates were expected to narrate the story which include the following points,
(i)                 Joseph was the son of Jacob and his wife Rachael.
(ii)               Jacob loved Joseph more than any of his 12 children, because he was the son of his old age.
(iii)             For this reason, Jacob made a beautiful robe with long sleeves for Joseph.
(iv)             His brothers hated him for this favouritism among other points.
Candidates should therefore read Genesis 37:1-38, for the full story.
The ( b) part was poorly attempted as most candidates did not understand the phrase ‘moral lesson’ .Candidates were  expected to deduce moral lessons from the story but
most candidates were unable to address the question adequately. Some of the notable values expected to be presented include the need to:
(i)                 Overcome material gains,
(ii)               Listen to good counsel or advice
(iii)             Avoid bad friends/company/ peers
(iv)             Avoid hatred/ jealousy/ evil/
(v)               Beware of deceptive suggestion/ exercise caution, etc.
Candidates are therefore advised to read passages carefully with the intent to extract moral lessons and to relate the message to general issues.
Question 2
(a)   Outline five contributions of Caliph Abu Bakr to Islam.
(b)   State two lessons that can be learnt from the life of Caliph Abu Bakr.
The question was not popular, as very few candidates attempted it. Those who attempted it scored high marks therefore giving an indication of some amount of adequate preparation. Responses expected from candidates include the following:
(i)                 Abu Bakr was the first Caliph to succeed Prophet Mohammed.
(ii)               Helped in the collection of various fragmented verses to make the Quran into a single book.
(iii)             Helped to build the mosque of Medina and paid for the land on which it was built
(iv)             Helped the prophet Mohammed to fight many jihads (Holy war)/ he formed a well-trained army / he was a great warrior.
(v)               Taught Muslims the Hajj rites and rituals, etc.
The (b) part was poorly answered as candidates could not extract the lessons derived from the Caliph Abu Bakr. The candidates had difficulty in bringing out the lessons attributed to the works and life of the personality under review.
The lessons that could be derived from Caliph Abu Bakr’s life among others include:
(i)                 Be willing to use wealth for the work of Allah / Good cause.
(ii)               Have courage to sacrifice all we have for the faithful service of Allah. (iii)  Endure all forms of trials and tribulations for the faithful service of Allah
(iv)             Be honest, trust worthy and truthful in our deeds.
(v)               Help the poor and needy in society
Q3.
(a) Narrate the traditional myth which explains the separation between man and God (b) Give four examples of the character of humankind from the story in (a) above:
This question was the most popular one in this section. More than half of the candidates answered this question. It was well answered for both question (a), and (b), and candidates scored high marks.
A few candidates however deviated by narrating the creation story narrated by
Christians, (Bible). This implied that candidates did not understand the question.
Further more candidates could not give the required examples of the character of mankind.
The traditional religious narration story of the separation between man and God comes in two separate accounts and candidates could choose one.
The following points apply:
(i)                 God once lived very close to man.
(ii)               Man could touch him and feel his presence.
(iii)             Due to the disobedience of man, God withdrew from man.
(iv)             An old woman was pounding fufu everyday
(v)               She kept hitting God with her long pestle
(vi)             God warned her to desist from the practice
(vii)           But this activity continued until one day God withdrew and went to his present abode, i.e. the sky.
(viii)         Man tried to bring God back by making a ladder, but they could not get closer to him.
The other account   is from the Mende of (Sierra Leone). In this account,
(i)                 God was close to man
(ii)               He gave man permission to ask for anything that he wanted
(iii)             Everyday man went up to him for their needs
(iv)             Man’s demand became so incessant that God became worried
                        (iv)      God therefore removed himself from them and went up to the heavens
(vi)       A time came when there were no restrictions at all in the communication between God and man.
The (b) part  required that candidates should provide examples of the character of mankind from the  narration above.  Some candidates were unable to adequately address this part as they were expected to pick out behavioural traits. The answers expected from candidates include the following: man was
(i)                 Dishonest
(ii)               Greedy/ selfish
(iii)             Disrespectful
(iv)             Rebellious/ lawless
(v)               Irresponsible, among others.
Question 4
(a)               Describe four processes involved in showing repentance.
(b)               Outline four reasons for showing regret for one’s wrong deed.
This question was as popular as other questions. A good number of candidates failed to describe the processes involved at showing repentance. Where the processes were listed, candidates failed to expand them.
Furthermore, some of the candidates made meaningful statements without identifying the various processes. Performance was creditable.
The   following responses were required:
(i)                 Acknowledgement: Realising one’s fault or wrong action as sinner or wrong doer and accepting full responsibility for one’s actions.
(ii)               Regret: Showing regret / remorse for doing wrong, or for the bad deeds done.
(iii)             Pardon: Request for pardon or forgiveness – Approach the one we have wronged and humbly apologize.
(iv)             Cease: Avoid the wrong thing again. Need not to repeat such deeds.
The (b) part required candidates to indicate why there is the need for regrets and over 40% candidates addressed this part properly.
Question 5
(a)   List five factors to be considered before greeting someone.
(b)   Why it is important to greet someone.
This question was popular with candidates with over fifty percent of candidates attempting it. In spite of its popularity, candidates’ performance was on the average.
Candidates were required to give examples to support the factors which most candidates failed to address hence the average performance.
For the (b) part, most candidates repeated their points and therefore did not earn any additional marks.
Question 6
(a)                  State three dangers associated with self-medication.
(b)                 Suggest four ways of checking trade in drugs.
This question was the most popular question because a lot more candidates attempted it. Some candidates did not know that self-medication is the same as drug abuse, or the wrongful use of drugs without medical prescription. Performance was poor apparently due to the difficulty of understanding the question.
There were isolated cases of excellent performances however.
The (b) part was quite challenging to most students as the candidates discussed how drugs should be made wholesome instead of how to check the abuse.
Question 7
(a)     What is recreation?
(b)     Give four advantages of recreation.
This question was not popular because just a few of the candidates chose it. Most candidates did not understand the concept “recreation”, and wrote about the process of recreation of the earth or creating (reproducing). Candidates scored zero marks, due to this deviation.
Candidates were expected to demonstrate understanding of recreation by defining / describing/showing the meaning of recreation. The following responses were expected.
(i)                 It is a state of not working/ spare time (i.e.) being free from normal activities/ school work
(ii)               It is the constructive use of time/ making good use of time.
(iii)             It is a state of leisure when one does something for enjoyment, amusement or pleasure eg, going on nature walks, swimming, reading, listening to music, watering films, excursions, playing game etc.
(iv)             Recreation or leisure time is usually planned and controlled/ it is different from idleness.
In the (b) part, responses were wrong because candidates deviated in 7a.
Question 8
(a)         What are human rights?
(b)         Explain any four human rights.
This question was by far a very popular question. Majority of the candidates attempted and scored higher marks, candidates were able to raise the following points:
(i)                 They are freedoms which are generally accepted that every living person should have or enjoy.
(ii)               They are things a person is entitled to have because the law of the land permits or allows them.
(iii)             They are claims of individuals supported by law. That is if someone infringes on someone’s rights, he may sue him in court for redress, etc.
(iv)             The purpose of the declaration is to promote and encourage respect for human rights and basic freedoms.
(v)               The declaration sets out what people should have the right to life freedom, security, Nationality, property etc.

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.